News & Politics » Transportation

The controversial Belmont flyover has federal approval—but still faces other hurdles

Some neighborhood residents are bitterly opposed to the project, which proponents say is essential for meeting future Red Line demand.

by

29 comments
A crowded inbound Red Line car during the morning rush last week. - JOHN GREENFIELD
  • John Greenfield
  • A crowded inbound Red Line car during the morning rush last week.

When I rode the Red Line from Uptown to downtown during the morning rush last week, my rail car was as packed as a sardine can by the time we left the Belmont stop. Damon Lockett, a copywriter who commutes daily from Edgewater to River North, told me that overcrowded trains are typical during peak hours nowadays.

"They don't run enough trains," said Lockett, who moved here from New York City about a year ago. "You're waiting ten or 15 minutes for a train, while the platform's just loading up with people."

The CTA is planning to address overcrowding on north-side el lines with the upcoming Red-Purple Modernization project. This multibillion-dollar initiative will completely overhaul the nearly 100-year-old Red Line from Belmont to Howard and the Purple Line from Belmont to Linden, in suburban Wilmette.

The agency says the project's single most important time-saving and capacity-building element is the Red-Purple Bypass, better known as the Belmont flyover. This $570 million proposal would unsnarl the junction north of Belmont—where Brown Line trains cross Red and Purple Line tracks—by building a roller-coaster-like overpass.

The current track configuration forces southbound Purple and Red Line trains, and northbound Red Line trains to wait while northbound Brown Line trains cross the tracks. - CTA
  • CTA
  • The current track configuration forces southbound Purple and Red Line trains, and northbound Red Line trains to wait while northbound Brown Line trains cross the tracks.

The flyover, and the rest of the modernization plan, recently got the federal go-ahead after passing an environmental review by the Federal Transit Administration. Construction could start as early as late 2017. But hurdles to the project remain: the CTA still needs to find $1.9 billion in funding for the first phase of plan, and many central Lakeview residents are bitterly opposed to the flyover, which would require the demolition of 16 buildings.

Local transit experts and advocates argue that the flyover is essential for meeting future demand. Ridership along the Red Line corridor north of Belmont grew by 40 percent between 2010 and 2014, according to CTA spokeswoman Tammy Chase.

The CTA estimates that, by unclogging the so-called Clark Junction, the bypass will allow the agency to add up to eight more Red Line trains, carrying 30 percent (7,200) more riders per hour during rush periods.

"While we can live without the flyover today, it's more to deal with the future," says DePaul University transportation expert Joseph Schwieterman. "The project is for the 25 percent growth in the corridor that's projected over the next 20 years—and that's a conservative projection."

The CTA projects that ridership on the Red, Purple, and Brown Lines will soon greatly exceed the capacity of the Clark Junction - CTA
  • CTA
  • The CTA projects that ridership on the Red, Purple, and Brown Lines will soon greatly exceed the capacity of the Clark Junction

The additional capacity made possible by the flyover would result in 43,200 additional daily trips, or more than ten million additional trips annually, according to calculations made by UIC's Urban Transportation Center.

In addition to increasing rush-hour capacity, Chase says, the flyover would eliminate the crossing delays that affect at least 40 percent of Red, Purple, and Brown Line trains.

"The conflict at the junction and the speed-restricted curve combine to slow each train traveling between Belmont and Addison by one to three minutes on average," she says.

Mayor Emanuel appears to have exaggerated the flyover's benefits when he announced the flyover project in April 2014.

"We're going to increase the capacity by 30 to 50 percent of moving trains on time rather than the three- to four-minute wait," he said at the press conference.

Soon afterwards, the Reader's Ben Joravsky did a somewhat unscientific test of the Clark Junction delays, clocking more than 30 trains from the Belmont platform with a stopwatch. He found that the typical wait was only 25 to 30 seconds, and the longest delay was roughly 40 seconds.

But the CTA stands by the project’s necessity. “We’ve always talked about it being about the capacity as well as the congestion,” Chase says.

"I’m not crazy. I know that they need to repair the tracks. . . . But I don’t think they need this thing up in the sky that’s really going to be a blight on central Lakeview."

—Belmont flyover opponent Ellen Hughes­

All that extra capacity comes with a hefty price tag. The bill for Phase I—which includes the flyover, rebuilding track structures and stations between Lawrence and Bryn Mawr, and making all stations wheelchair accessible—would likely be funded in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation's Core Capacity Improvements program, which provides dollars for improvements to older "legacy" transit systems. However, the federal grant would require significant local matching funds.

The price of the bypass, originally stated as $320 million when the city announced the initiative in 2014, was bumped up to $570 million last year, because the scope was expanded to include new signals and reconstruction of nearby track structures. The latter would involve straightening a curve in the Red and Purple Line tracks between Roscoe and Newport, increasing maximum train speeds.

"Obviously the big thing now is the money," Chase says.

But residents like Ellen Hughes, a grant writer who lives just north of the Belmont station, feel the flyover project would be a waste of taxpayer money, as well as a wasteful destruction of property. Hughes runs the group Coalition to Stop the Belmont Flyover, and has helped lead the opposition to the project. This included a November 2014 ballot referendum that involved the three precincts of the 44th Ward that would be most heavily impacted by the demolitions. Residents voted overwhelmingly against the project, with 72 percent of the 800-some people who voted opposing the measure.

Rendering of the Red-Purple Bypass without redevelopment - CTA
  • CTA
  • Rendering of the Red-Purple Bypass without redevelopment
Rendering of the Red-Purple Bypass after redevelopment - CTA
  • CTA
  • Rendering of the Red-Purple Bypass after redevelopment

"I'm not crazy," Hughes says. "I know that they need to repair the tracks, and the stations need to be made accessible. But I don't think they need this thing up in the sky that's really going to be a blight on central Lakeview."

"I wouldn't be losing my house, but it's a moral cause for me," she adds. "I think it's wrong to spend $570 million on this and tear down some lovely condo buildings."

But with the number of additional new trips made possible by the flyover, the $570 million price tag breaks down to just $2.65 per additional ride when spread over two decades.

"If you compare these numbers with the best new rail lines in the country, you'll find that the investment is very competitive," says Steve Schlickmann, director of UIC's Urban Transportation Center.

Also factored in: the cost of doing nothing.

"Without continued investments like the bypass, crowding on the Red Line will only get worse, as projections indicate transit demand in the area will continue to rise," says Kyle Whitehead, campaign director for the Active Transportation Alliance. "More riders will be forced to watch packed trains go by during peak periods, and frustrated riders will consider driving." v

John Greenfield edits the transportation news website Streetsblog Chicago.


Comments (29)

Showing 1-25 of 29

Add a comment
 

Add a comment