Detroit News, April 29, 1931.
It used to be standard practice in adultery-related divorce suits for the cheated-upon parties to sue the third party for “alienation of affection.” Essentially the seducer or seductress had robbed of them of a lifetime of lovin’, and they were entitled to cash compensation for that loss. But then it was ultimately up to a judge or jury to determine how much all that love was worth. What were the criteria? In the above case, the jury is implicitly measuring it by the pound. But there had to be hurt feelings to go around when an award came back $30K light. Even the new possessor of the runaway spouse has to feel insulted on some level, no matter if he or she is catching a huge financial break.
But then there’s this other case to consider, from Detroit News, March 19, 1931:
What the heck? Did the jury confer and decide that Agatha was 10 percent hotter than Anton's claim reflected?