Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe
It's a new world. The Audit Bureau of Circulations reported its latest six-month figures, and the Sun-Times rules the local roost.
The ABC "ranked the Sun-Times and its branded editions as the ninth largest newspaper in the country, just ahead of the Tribune," the Sun-Times reported. "The Sun-Times editions include six suburban dailies, a three-times-a-week paper and the Pioneer Press chain of weeklies."
If you haven't been paying attention, you might wonder what such titles as the Lake Zurich Courier and Post-Tribune in Lake County, Indiana, have to do with the Sun-Times. Under recent rule changes, they are known as "branded editions" and count. If it's a charade, the Tribune goes along with it. For the Tribune reports:
"Offsetting print losses with digital gains, the Chicago Sun-Times and its network of branded suburban papers passed the Chicago Tribune in average weekday circulation in the latest six-month report released Tuesday by the Audit Bureau of Circulations."
Yes, digital circulation counts too, and well it should, even if no one knows just what weight to give it.
Here are the ABC lines on the two Chicago dailies:
(Once upon a time that was the only circulation number that mattered)
Total Excluding Branded Editions
Total Branded Editions
Total Average Circulation as of 3/31/12
Total Average Circulation as of 3/31/11
Here's an overview of the ABC report that shows (if you scroll down) the new numbers of the country's top papers, including the whopping lead the Tribune still holds over the Sun-Times on Sunday. Included is some good advice:
"Significant ABC U.S. rule changes in the past 18 months have addressed the newspaper industry’s continuing transformation and publishers and advertisers emphasis on cross-media audience metrics, not focusing solely on paid print circulation."
Therefore . . .
"Due to the many ways that newspapers now distribute and market their content—metered paywalls, mobile apps, bundled subscriptions, branded editions—ABC cautions against drawing too many direct comparisons of the data."