The New York Times publishes the best reason yet for not naming a source | Bleader

The New York Times publishes the best reason yet for not naming a source

by

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

comment

anon.jpg
The New York Times may have finally settled the debate over when it's OK to use anonymous sources. Times policy: only when the source has a good enough reason.

But what's a good enough reason? The Times just made that clear.

Wrote James Barron in Wednesday's New York edition, reporting on results of a restroom restoration project at midtown's Port Authority bus terminal:

A second person who checked out the women's restroom—and who asked not to be identified because she has always wanted to be an anonymous source—reported her findings by email: "Black shiny granite-y sink. Arched faucets by Sloan. Tasteful slate gray and powder gray tiles."

Works for me.

Add a comment