Kill the Innocent? | Letters | Chicago Reader

News & Politics » Letters

Kill the Innocent?



Mr. Miner,

In your 11/1 Reader column [Hot Type] you write that some readers "might be wondering where the Tribune gets off, posturing in public about the ethical principles that guide it." When it comes to the editorial board's ethics regarding capital punishment, I'm still wondering about two 1999 editorials acknowledging that innocents will inevitably be executed on occasion, regardless of whatever safeguards are in place ("No human decision-making process can ever be foolproof"). Since the Tribune supports the death penalty anyway, doesn't this mean that they're openly advocating killing the innocent? And isn't killing the innocent what capital punishment is supposed to punish in the first place?

So it seems that the editorial board members deserve to die by their own professed principles. Such is the rhetorical degeneracy of Public Intellectual Space when the willingness of public voices to pander to the worst in human nature knoweth no limit.

Best wishes,

Dan Kritchevsky


Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  →