Reconsidering Reaganomics | Letters | Chicago Reader

News & Politics » Letters

Reconsidering Reaganomics



Recondsidering Reganomics


Ted Kleine, reviewing the Ronald Reagan biography, Dutch [October 29], claims that Reagan charmed America into accepting Reaganomics, which Kleine characterized as "the ludicrous theory that cutting taxes would increase revenues to the treasury."

I know that bashing Reagan is a favorite sport in many circles, so I apologize in advance for introducing the following uncomfortable facts. In fiscal 1981, federal budget receipts totaled $599.3 billion. In 1989, federal budget receipts totaled $991.2 billion. That's amounts to an increase of $391.9 billion, or about 65 percent. (Figures courtesy of the Congressional Budget Office's Web site.) Ludicrous, ain't it?

Nicholas J. Kaster

Oak Park

Ted Kleine replies:

Mr. Kaster's figures are correct, though it should be noted that federal revenues have increased every year since 1959, with the exception of one year: 1983. What I should have called ludicrous was Reagan's contention that the government could cut taxes and increase defense spending without creating a budget deficit. The deficit increased from $78.9 billion to $153 billion during Reagan's presidency, while the national debt swelled from $997 billion to $2.8 trillion. Generations of Americans will be working to pay back the money Reagan borrowed to fatten the wallets of defense contractors.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  →