That Was No Endorsement | Letters | Chicago Reader

News & Politics » Letters

That Was No Endorsement

by

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

comment

While I think it is fantastic that you wrote a relatively unbiased article to educate the general public on pit bulls, I have to ask why you only spoke with trainers who use compulsion-based training techniques ["Born Bad?" February 24]. You write about the horrors that these dogs go through to make them attack humans--the beatings and starvation. What is so different between beating a dog to train it and shocking a dog?

Because one idiot thinks you can't train a pit bull with "cookies" and you have to inflict physical pain, you just take her word for it? I personally am a certified dog trainer, and both I and my colleagues who use positive reinforcement have trained hundreds of pit bulls with varying degrees of issues and seen wonderful results. To completely promote compulsion-based training as the only way to go is irresponsible. I am very surprised at the lack of research done on the options for training, especially from your paper, which I in general hold in very high regard. I had hoped to send this article out to my clients as some good information on the breed, but with your blatant endorsement of these horribly abusive techniques I never would.

Lisa Collins

Roscoe Village

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  →